[*BCM*] Critical Mass and Civil Disobedience

[Robert Arnold]

Is there anybody lobbying the city to change this particular law? 
Talking amongst ourselves is fine and all, but isn't change what we're
ultimately striving for?

Rob


On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 11:12:09 -0500, rogerbwinn at letterboxes.org
<rogerbwinn at letterboxes.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> > CM feels it is their right to do this, and if they do, then it is
> > their right to so believe.  But if they're going to go to civil
> > disobedience against laws they know exist but feel are unjust, then
> > fine.  That's how change happens, but inthe meantime if you're going
> > to break it to protest it, you're going to have to suffer the
> > consequences until change happens.
> >
> 
> now i know there are few different theories on civil disobedience.  and
> the predominate one that i hear is that, if you get arrested for it, you
> should need to suck it up and deal with the consequence (as expressed
> above).  i don't have this take on civil disobedience for CM.  we're not
> going out there and trying to get arrested.  and if we're not trying to
> get arrested en masse (which i'm certainly not advocating), then it
> makes no tactical sense to let the occasional random person get picked
> off.  it accomplishes nothing.  i think the laws are ridiculous.  we
> should be able to ride two abreast.  and if i do so at the mass, i'm
> going to do everything i can to avoid legal trouble, so i can come back
> and ride another day.  all i'm saying is that we should do whatever we
> can to avoid suffering the consequences.  don't get caught, so we can
> come and ride another day.  at least that's my take on things.
> 
> love,
> roger
> 
> --
> 
>   rogerbwinn at letterboxes.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Boston Critical Mass mailing list
> list at bostoncriticalmass.org
> http://bostoncriticalmass.org/list
>