[*BCM*] Cyclists "shall be subject to the traffic laws and regulations of the Commonwealth"

[turtle]

Indeed, in Massachusetts, bicyclists must follow all state traffic laws,
signs, and signals, including those that apply to "motor vehicles". 
According to state law (Chapter 85, section 11B, see:
http://massbike.org/bikelaw/ ), the only three traffic law differences
for bicyclists are:

1. Bicyclists are permitted to pass on the right (though it's not very
safe).
2. Bicyclists are NOT permitted to ride next to eachother in the same
lane (a stupid law that would be changed with the passage of the
Bicyclists Bill of Rights and Responsibilities).
3. Bicycles may be ridden on sidewalks outside business districts "when
necessary for safety", as long as you yield to pedestrians.

Other than those excecptions, bicyclists are required by state law to
follow all traffic laws.  

Obviously, lots of people don't know this, and many others don't give a
shit.  But reality is that you can get cited and prosecuted for
violating traffic laws on your bike as you would in an automobile.

Note, we're not talking about equipment laws here, just traffic laws. 
Obviously, different types of vehicles have different equipment laws. 
For example, bikes are required to have a white, front headlight at
night, but aren't required to have any rear lights at all (though they
are definitely an excellent idea).

-Turtle




Boston Critical Mass <list at bostoncriticalmass.org> wrote:
> 
> On Apr 30, 2006, at 6:27 PM, Anarchist Judaism wrote:
> 
> > The regulation does specify motor vehicle, though.
> >
> 
> I think it's established elsewhere that bicyclists must follow all  
> motor vehicular traffic laws except where noted.
> _______________________________________________


----------------------------------
"One day we must come to see that peace is not merely a distant goal we
seek, but that it is a means by which we arrive at that goal.  We must
pursue peaceful ends through peaceful means." - Martin Luther King Jr.