[*BCM*] A report from the front lines of last night's CM
mpgbikes at gmail.com
Tue Aug 9 11:47:33 EDT 2011
> Corking for a few minutes at a single intersection, just to circlejerk and
> holler gleefully at the drivers stuck at the red light == *not good*
There seems to be a trend of virtually appending the phrase "assert control
of the road" with "just to stick it to the motorists" that I don't
necessarily believe is legitimate. The African-American Civil Rights
marchers of the 1960s did not assert themselves "just to stick it to
whitey." Women did not assert their rights "just to stick it to men," and
gays did not seek the right to marry "just to stick it to straight people."
They asserted themselves because they believes resources that were available
to others should be available to them, too.
You say that drivers will need to stop breeding and die off before cycling
conditions will improve. I disagree. Bike lanes are springing up all over
the country. Conditions have vastly improved over the past 10-15 years,
everywhere from small towns to big cities you can find bikes lanes where
before there where none. Not only is this a battle we can win, it is one
many cyclists elsewhere have already won.
Critical Mass corking and occupying an intersection is a wholly different
issue from an individual cyclist running red lights and doing other things
that put herself and others in danger. Corking and occupying is safe. If a
driver goes into road rage and uses his vehicle as a deadly weapon to attack
a cyclist, the cyclist is not the one who needs to prosecuted or be forced
to explain her behavior. If a motorist hits a cyclist, he can expect his
insurance rates to go way up at the very least.
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Hiroyuki G Yamada <hyamada at mit.edu> wrote:
> I'm all for asserting my rights as a cyclist in Boston. I think CM does a
> relatively good job of that, but when I see things like this (the
> *unnecessary* corking for an extended period of time), all I can think is
> that it's going to infuriate some people. There may be those who say "oh
> those silly cyclists, look at them go," but most will think "dammit get the
> fork out of the way, I'm already 2 hours into my friday night commute!"
> - Riding in a big mass, for safety, visibility, and for fun == good
> - Riding through the tunnel at Harvard, whooping and enjoying the
> night, without obstructing traffic significantly more than we do on any
> other street at any other point in the mass == good
> - Corking, to maintain that safe "critical mass," before moving the
> ride in its entirety on to another location == good
> - Corking for a few minutes at a single intersection, just to
> circlejerk and holler gleefully at the drivers stuck at the red light ==
> *not good*
> Yes, asserting your rights in an obnoxious and aggressive fashion will
> result in change *eventually* (if all the aggressive car-loving drivers in
> the world are stopped from breeding and eventually die off...). In the short
> run, however, it will piss people off and generate road rage. either
> immediately, like this past month, or in the longer-term. what about the
> next time that driver is cut off by a bike, still with the foul taste of
> encountering a rowdy CM in his mouth. when it's not 300 bikes, but 1 or 2;
> maybe he drives too fast, too close. maybe he doesn't indicate and just
> takes a sharp right turn. maybe he kills you.
> CM, and anytime anyone rides a bike anywhere on any street in any city, is
> putting all of cycling, all cyclists everywhere, on trial. every time you
> run a red light, or every time you don't indicate before turning, every time
> you break even minor traffic laws (which cyclists are required to follow, as
> a vehicle on the road) you make cyclists a less legitimate occupant of the
> road. and yes, corking an intersection for an impromptu dance party falls
> into the category of "breaking the law."
> *TL;DR -- we need to promote sharing the road, not fighting for it.* *that's
> not a battle we can win.*
> (note: I wasn't at this CM, so I don't know how long the intersection was
> blocked off, or how dangerous the road rage was. I've seen similar
> situations, though, at CMs in Boston and elsewhere, where drivers are
> unnecessarily antagonized and provoked, simply for the sake of "taking back
> the road.")
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Matthew Gilbert <mpgbikes at gmail.com>wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Mars <martian at mit.edu> wrote:
>>> I think it's fair to say that the message received (as as this action is
>>> the sole reason I stopped riding with CM) by motorists is a clear "ha ha
>>> fuck you". It is my opinion that this type of behavior is doing nothing but
>>> making cycling conditions in Boston MUCH worse. Thanks, and good job.
>> Some of us don't see it that way. Did you catch this?
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Rebecca Albrecht <ralbrecht at speakeasy.net>
>>> Date: Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 12:59 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [*BCM*] Bostoncriticalmass Digest, Vol 85, Issue 3
>>> To: list at bostoncriticalmass.org
>>> I am
>>> uncomfortable with the circling at the intersection of Comm.Ave.&
>>> Harvard Street & I usually leave at that point since I am close to my
>>> home. It’s a big intersection that requires corking for about seven
>>> lanes of traffic so I understand the empowerment that is felt to have
>>> those streets for a short period of time. I found it interesting that
>>> the video clip of the corking at the July CM ride was 34 seconds long.
>>> My guess is that the bike riders were there at most for one minute. Not
>>> an awfully long time for cars to be held up except of course it was
>>> bicycles that were obstructing them. In general very few cars are
>>> affected by CM on the vast expanse of our city streets. There have been
>>> a few times when I had been in my car during CM & I had hoped that our
>>> paths would cross. Most people seem happy to see us and give us high
>>> fives or a friendly toot on their car horns. Car drivers need to chill
>>> out because CM passes fairly quickly but some car drivers are rude & hey
>>> they just ruin it for all of us more tolerant, fun-loving car drivers!
>> However you see the message, there is no way that a group of anyone
>> drawing attention to themselves and asserting their rights is going to lead
>> to worse conditions. Not unless we happen to live in a repressive fascist
>> state, which we don't.
>> And what would you have us do, then? Crowd on to the road alongside the
>> cars like we do every day? Split the ride into small, un-assertable groups
>> at every stop light? What is your vision for a better, bike-friendlier
>> Boston and how do you propose we get there?
>> Boston Critical Mass mailing list
>> list at bostoncriticalmass.org
>> To unsubscribe email list-unsubscribe at bostoncriticalmass.org
> Boston Critical Mass mailing list
> list at bostoncriticalmass.org
> To unsubscribe email list-unsubscribe at bostoncriticalmass.org
Enjoying life in the suburbs without a car since 2007
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bostoncriticalmass